Some fun can be had remixing the lyrics for Sweet Dreams (Are Made of This) by the Eurythmics. First of all, there are two official music videos the original
And the second one
The most well-known remix of the lyrics is for cheese!
Sweet dreams are made of cheese,
who am I to diss a Brie.
I cheddar the world and the feta cheese,
everybody’s looking for Stilton.
Some of them want to fondue you,
Some of them want to be fondued
Some of Edam want Roquefort, too.
Some of them want to have some Blue
Some of them want cheddar fondue,
Some them want to a sweet danish blue
And here’s one that was cobbled together by me and a few friends about teas!
Sweet dreams are made of teas,
brew am chai to steep the leaves
I savour the world for the perfect earl grey
Everybody’s looking for darjeeling
Some of them want to infuse you,
Some of them want to be infused by you
Some of them want to cosy up to you,
Some of them want to be cosied by you
This post was from September 2011 on Tumblr. Based on a post by willowphoto on Tumblr. Things have not gotten better :(
I hate to do this, but I’m really not proud of Australia these days.
Australians all let us reject,
Those who aren’t young and free;
We’ve gotten spoiled and withheld our toil;
Except to guard our sea;
Elect not to share nature’s gifts
Of beauty rich and rare;
This sad story’s page, is at the stage
Of loosing Australia Fair.
Our wasteful reigns force us to sing,
Please help Australia Fair.
Beneath our heavy Southern Cross
We’ll withdraw our hearts and hands;
To fake this Commonwealth of ours
Took people from their lands;
For those who dare to cross the seas
We’re not prepared to share;
With cowardice we turn our backs
On those who our seek our care.
In mournful pains for not keeping,
Our poor Australia Fair.
I hope I can look back at this and say we moved on and became better…
And here’s another remix. I’m not sure where this is from. I’ve changed it a little bit.
Australians all let us rejoice
for we are white and straight.
We’ve mined our soil and killed for oil
We’ve turned back refugees.
Our land abounds in trees to log
A reef to dump and dredge.
As Sirs and Dames,
We’ll flout the shame,
Advance Australia Fair!
let profits reign, all serve the rich,
Advance Australia Fair
The sentiment and points in the article You’re Not Stupid; Ello Is Badly Designed by Elena Palmer on The Toast are things I need to keep in mind.
“[Ello] wasn’t ready for a public beta – there were too many prominent bugs and usability problems. But when I looked at the conclusion on Twitter, there was a theme that wasn’t present in my own high handed criticism: a bunch of highly educated, internet-savvy women were asking each other, “Am I stupid, or is Ello not working?””
“there are many types of intelligence, a significant number of which are not suited to evaluation via tech use. But putting that point aside for the moment, let’s focus on the fact that we measure our intelligence via our ability to pick up tech and use it fluently. But when we fail, women almost invariably blame themselves, at least partially. Men almost invariably blame the technology, if they’re using it, and user error, if a woman is using it.”
I need to be more aware of my own assumptions and areas of skill. Knowledge and skills I do not possess are just as worthy and valuable as those I do. Perspectives that I do not have are often even more valuable than my own, as they highlight mistaken assumptions or areas I have neglected to consider. Most importantly, lived experience always overrides theory. I build software for people and provide research assistance to people.
Copyright for anything should be a maximum of ~40 years (more like 15 years), not life of the author plus 50/70 years as it currently is.
I mostly blame Mickey Mouse/Disney and co.
This image is from a blog post by Tom W. Bell at TechLiberation Front.
“In this paper we have developed a simple dynamic model for analysing copyright term. In Proposition 1 we derived a single, simple, equation that defined optimal term as a function of key exogenous variables. Using the estimates for these variables derived from the available empirical data we obtained a point estimate for optimal copyright term of approximately 15 years (with a 99% confidence interval extending up to 38 years). To our knowledge this is the first such estimate which is properly grounded, both theoretically and empirically. This result has significant implications for policy. Copyright term is probably the most important aspect of the overall ‘level’ of copyright. The estimate obtained for optimal term (15 years) is far below the length of copyright in almost all jurisdictions. Furthermore, while an exact point estimate is obviously subject to considerable variation due to the uncertainty in the underlying parameters, we confirmed using a variety of robustness checks that current copyrights are almost certainly too long. This implies that there is a significant role for policy makers to improve social welfare by reducing copyright term as well as indicating that existing terms should not be extended.”
The Pirate Party’s copyright policy is also worth reading.
If you think you have ‘noting to hide, nothing to fear’. a) bullshit. b) read this about why privacy always matters:
From that article:
“understanding privacy as a plurality of related issues demonstrates that the disclosure of bad things is just one among many difficulties caused by government security measures. To return to my discussion of literary metaphors, the problems are not just Orwellian (surveillance/information collection) but Kafkaesque (data analysis/information processing). Government information-gathering programs are problematic even if no information that people want to hide is uncovered.”
Privacy is not about hiding ‘bad’ things:
“the problem with the nothing-to-hide argument is the underlying assumption that privacy is about hiding bad things. By accepting this assumption, we concede far too much ground and invite an unproductive discussion about information that people would very likely want to hide. As the computer-security specialist Schneier aptly notes, the nothing-to-hide argument stems from a faulty “premise that privacy is about hiding a wrong.” Surveillance, for example, can inhibit such lawful activities as free speech, free association, and other First Amendment rights essential for democracy.”